Now it's your turn
Monday, November 06, 2006
Over the past week or so, this newspaper and others around the state
and across the country have been published editorial endorsements of
candidates up for election tomorrow. It's a publishing tradition that
comes around once a year, like the holiday season.
These endorsements mean a lot to the candidates who crave glowing
editorial praise, of course. After all, most of them have contact with
the people who work at their state and local newspapers.
It's human nature that they would want a printed expression of
approval from people they know and who follow their exploits more
closely than anyone else.
Many of them, convinced of their own superb performances as public
servants, downright expect it.
These newspaper endorsements are probably not as significant to
prospective voters, however.
They've pretty much made up their minds or are at least well down the
road to preferring one candidate over another in any given race well
before the endorsements start to appear.
If anything, more fervent partisans will insist the editorial
endorsement was right on the money and beautifully written if it
endorsed their candidate or they'll say that it was the most ridiculous,
stupid thing they've ever read if it didn't.
The bottom line is that endorsements by newspapers and unions and
other elected officials and all the other pre-election hubbub don't mean
a thing compared to the endorsements that are delivered by all the
people who will go to the polls tomorrow.
We urge all registered Staten Islanders, wherever they come down on
the candidates and the issues, not to pass up that powerful privilege.
We believe the more people who make their voices heard at the polls
each November, the truer and stronger our democracy becomes.
For what it's worth, following is recap of the Advance's endorsements
in the 2006 election:
For governor: Eliot Spitzer (D). The current state attorney general
has led this race wire to wire over Republican John Faso, and that's for
good reason. He's smart, tough and determined to do a complete overhaul
of business as usual in Albany.
A big mandate from the voters tomorrow will give him the political
leverage he needs.
For the U.S. Senate: Hillary Clinton (D). She may still be a
polarizing figure nationwide, but she's done a great job of building
bridges with people of all political descriptions across the state.
That's part of the reason she'll win in a landslide over Republican John
Spencer tomorrow.
For state attorney general: Jeanine Pirro (R). We're bucking the tide
across the state on this one, but we think she's more qualified, smarter
and more aggressive and will do a better job as AG than Democrat Andrew
Cuomo. All the tabloid headlines swirling around her stem from her
husband's varied indiscretions, not anything she did. We think she
deserves the chance.
For comptroller: Neither candidate. We've always been big supporters
of incumbent Democratic Comptroller Alan Hevesi, and, in truth, he's
done a terrific job. But his misuse of a taxpayer-funded driver for his
wife and his glib rationalizations for that transgression are
intolerable for an official charged with oversight of hundreds of
billions in state money.
His principal opponent, Republican Christopher Callaghan, just isn't
up to the job.
For state Senate (24th Senate District): Andrew Lanza (R). We've had
our disagreements with Mr. Lanza, but he's clearly a dedicated and
dynamic public official who puts Staten Island's best interests first
and the best candidate to take over retiring Sen. John Marchi's longtime
seat.
His Democratic and Conservative opponents, Matthew Titone and Charles
Pistor, respectively deserve much credit for their intelligent and civil
campaigns.
For state Senate (23rd Senate District): Diane Savino (D). It's been
just two years since she was first elected to represent the two-borough
district which encompasses Staten Island's North and East shores, but
she's made herself into something of a political institution here
already. Intelligent, tough and savvy as they come about the inner
workings of the legislature, she's been a real find for this borough.
That she has no opponent in the race says a lot about the job she's
done.
For Assembly (60th Assembly District): Janele Hyer-Spencer (D). In
her second go-round for the seat in the far-flunk South
Shore/Mid-Island/Bay Ridge seat she's brought the same intelligent ideas
and determination she brought in her first campaign two years ago. This
year, with incumbent Matthew Mirones retiring, she should have a good
shot.
Her opponent is Republican Anthony Xanthakis, legal counsel to Mr.
Mirones who seems to make a better campaigner than he would be a
lawmaker.
For Assembly (61st Assembly District): John Lavelle (D). Mr. Lavelle
is far more low-key than most lawmakers, but he works behind the scenes
to get things done for his district without fanfare. We wish he were a
little less complacent about the dysfunctional way in which the
legislature continues to operate in spite of demands for reform, but he
knows the ropes and works well within the environment that exists.
His opponent is Republican Rose Margarella, a teacher at Markham
Intermediate School with good ideas about the schools.
For Assembly (62nd Assembly District): Vincent Ignizio. He's a
high-energy go-getter whose gotten a lot done for a freshman
minority-party Assemblyman. We look for even more in his second term.
And he'll get it because he's running unopposed.
For Assembly (63rd Assembly District): Michael Cusick. Mr. Cusick is
superb legislative and political technician, even though he's just
ending his second term in the Assembly. He's moved a lot of good bills
for Staten Island and for the state and his future looks bright.
His opponent, Victor Grossman, is a patent attorney who has done
surprisingly well for a non-politician in his second campaign against
the incumbent.
For state Supreme Court: William Mastro (D); Michael Ajello (C);
Joseph Maltese (R): All three are incumbent Staten Island jurists of the
highest caliber. Yet the likelihood, because of Staten Island's steep
disadvantage in the two-borough 2nd Judicial District, only one, only
Judge Mastro will get a Supreme Court seat.
The other two will likely be out of a job. Vote for all three only
those three and thumb your nose the Brooklyn Democratic bosses.
For Congress (13th Congressional District): Vito Fossella (R). We've
endorsed Mr. Fossella regularly throughout his career because he's done
a good job serving the people of this borough. He still does in terms of
local issues so he has our endorsement again.
But his consistent, below-the-radar votes on the most radical
legislation before the Republican-controlled Congress on national issues
have even moderate Republican supporters here concerned.
And his campaign's misrepresentations and distortions of his
opponent's positions border on despicable.
That opponent this time is Democratic Steve Harrison, a Brooklyn
lawyer and former Community Board 10 chairman who has, on balance,
fought the good fight in his underfunded challenge.
While strong on national issues, Mr. Harrison's major weakness in
this campaign has been his relative unfamiliarity with local issues and
views on them on this side of the bridge. Mr. Fossella gets our backing
one more time.
Now it's the turn of the people who make the only endorsements that
count -- the voters -- to decide.
Close Window